Is Obama Insane Like Hitler? Look at Project Gunrunner.

March 20, 2012
By CMAC

How did Hitler manage to rule Germany for 10 years without being stopped?  No one wanted to admit and discuss the insane truth that was Hitler and Hitler’s insane followers.
Hitler was a constant and habitual liar/like Obama.
He always couched his actions in lies.
Winston Churchill knew Hitler was a liar, but  in 1939 he would have never stated that Hitler was arresting millions of Jews to be burned.
ONE THING IS CLEAR BY OBAMA’S ACTIONS.   OBAMA SUPPORTS AND LOVES THOSE WHO KILL CHRISTIANS.

Obama Bypasses Congress, Gives $1.5 Billion to Muslim Brotherhood

IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THIS, YOU ARE ILL INFORMED.  YOU ARE NOT AWARE OF CURRENT INTERNATIONAL STRUGGLES BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS, AND WHO OBAMA MILITARILY SUPPORTS.

 

Explaining to the free world what Hitler was doing while he was doing it would have sounded beyond bizarre; and dwelling on the negative that was Hitler drives those who dwell on insanity a little insane.  Who would want that?
What if the truth was stranger than fiction?
For example:  What if Obama was not even born in this country but got elected president of the United States?  Obama has not produced a birth certificate that cannot be debunked. Anything goes after this big lie.
Obama clearly supported Al-Qaeda in Libya and Egypt; the people who flew the airplanes into the twin towers.  The whole world knows this.  Obama said he was supporting freedom, Arab spring.  The Clintons lied with him.
Obama militarily supported the Muslims who killed thousands of Christians in the Ivory Coast.  Obama said he was supporting freedom.  The Clintons lied with him.

Obama’s Second Related Christian Massacre: Ivory Coast Africa Where Obama Backed The Muslims ~ For Real.

For Obama:

Supporting freedom equated to supporting Muslims.
He has supported Muslims against Christians.  Repeat…  Obama has supported Muslims killing Christians in Kenya, Ivory Coast, Egypt, Libya against other Muslims but all for Sunni, and now in Syria ( Syrian rebels killing Christians).  This is what Obama does and has done.
Call me crazy, but what he has done could he be doing again in Mexico?
The mere fact we are asking this question shows how bad things have gotten.

Here are pictures of how the Taliban kills people in Afghanistan.

Here are pictures of how Mexicans are killing people in Mexico

Notice the similarity?

Mexicans did not used to kill people this way.

But, Muslims have been killing people this way around the world for 1300 years.

Know the REAL facts behind Operation Fast & Furious

 

 

video
  1. [Jul 14, 2011] Islamic terrorist groups are setting up shop in Mexico and forming alarming ties with the country’s brutal drug cartels, according to a 2010 internal memo …
    articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-14/politics/… – Cached
  2. A Tucson Police Department memo from September 2010 has been leaked onto the Internet by hackers, and it warns that Hezbollah has set up shop in Mexico. The terrorist …

    frontpagemag.com/2011/07/13/hezbollah-sets-up-shop-in-mexicoCached

  3. As if the threat of deadly drug cartels in Mexico wasn’t enough, some of them are joining forces

    liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/02/21/hez – Cached

  4. Tunnels the cartels have built that cross from Mexico into the U.S. have grown increasingly sophisticated. It is a learned skill, the agent said points to Hezbollah‘s …

    www.10news.com/news/27780427/detail.html – Cached

  5. “If they really wanted to start blowing stuff up, they could do it.” “Terrorist Group Setting Up Operations Near Border: Hezbollah Considered To Be More Advanced Than …

    www.jihadwatch.org/2011/05/hizballah-setting-up… – Cached

  6. While the Obama administration celebrates the death of Osama Bin Laden and our military forces are poking around in caves all over Afghanistan looking for members of …

    thetruthwins.com/archives/hezbollah-in-mexico-the-truth… – Cached

  7. … of a vast international drug smuggling ring with links to the militant group Hezbollah … producers get their product into the hands of cartels in Central America and Mexico

    www.theblaze.com/stories/report-hezbollah-operatives… – Cached

  8. New Zeal. From the San Diego News: A terrorist organization whose home base is in the Middle East has established another home base across the border in Mexico.

    gulagbound.com/16243/hezbollah-in-mexicoCached

  9. Hezbollah has been found in Mexico and is infiltrating the united states by crossing the open borders in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and california. This …
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWUSeOaMPGU – Cached

    More results from youtube.com »

  10. In June, a computer hacker group, Luiz Security, commonly abbreviated as LuizSec, targeted the Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZDPS). LuizSec has claimed …

    www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2269/hezbollah-mexicoCached

Obama lied and said he sent and tracked military weaponry  to Mexican drug cartels via Clinton and Holder as a means of catching drug cartel king pins, but now that explanation of project gunrunner has been proven false.
Everyone, including conservatives, offer the only alternative to Holder’s ridiculous claim he was  tracking guns in Mexico was  he was using the gun violence in Mexico to influence greater gun control in the  United States.
While Holder is anti gun, using Mexican gun violence as a way to encourage gun control in the United States sounds absurd.  How do the two equate?
But what Obama routinely has done in foreign country’s has been to give military weapons to Muslims.  From Saudi Arabia, to Yemen, to the Ivory Coast, to Libya, to Egypt, to Syria, etc.; Obama has given military support to Muslims.  …fact…
Was Obama helping Muslims militarily again as he has done in the past? (Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda are in Mexico working with drug cartels)… fact…
Explaining to the free world what Hitler was doing while he was doing it would have sounded beyond bizzare.
Hitler always hid behind nationalist socialist rhetoric.
Republican inaction on Obama’s agenda is literally letting another Hitler destroy America from the inside out.
BOB OWENS
PJ Media

Richard A. Serrano of the Los Angeles Times broke an exclusive story this morning that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) had top Operation Fast and Furious gun smuggler Manuel Fabian Celis-Acosta in custody while he was attempting to smuggle ammunition into Mexico, and made the decision to let him go:

Seven months after federal agents began the ill-fated Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation, they stumbled upon their main suspect in a remote Arizona outpost on the Mexican border, driving an old BMW with 74 rounds of ammunition and nine cellphones hidden inside.

Detained for questioning that day in May 2010, Manuel Fabian Celis-Acosta described to agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives his close association with a top Mexican drug cartel member, according to documents obtained this weekend by the Times/Tribune Washington Bureau.

The top Fast and Furious investigator, Special Agent Hope MacAllister, scribbled her phone number on a $10 bill after he pledged to cooperate and keep in touch with investigators.

Then Celis-Acosta disappeared into Mexico. He never called.

Had they arrested him red-handed trying to smuggle ammunition into Mexico, Fast and Furious might have ended quickly. Instead, the program dragged on for another eight months, spiraling out of control.

If you choose to believe Attorney General Eric Holder, the multi-agency strike force composed of assets from the ATF, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CID), Department of Homeland Security, and (if conducted legally with waivers from the Arms Export Control Act) the State Department wanted to catch drug cartel higher-ups by using this gun-walking plot. To anyone even remotely familiar with how professional criminals use guns, the Department of Justice’s public justification for Operation Fast and Furious never made sense, and how Operation Fast and Furious was designed to work discredits the attorney general’s claim.

The DOJ claims that higher-ups were the plot’s goal. This is entirely untrue.

In the world of drug cartels, firearms are a disposable consumable, much as copy paper is in a normal company. Just as Warren Buffett has far more pressing issues on his plate than determining where to buy copy paper and other office supplies, cartel ringleaders have more pressing concerns. With shifting alliances to maintain and exploit, and the need to cultivate relationships with politicians and law enforcement officers across international borders, they simply don’t have time for what amounts to obtaining consumable office supplies in their line of work.

Ask any federal law enforcement agent and they will corroborate that fact. Fast and Furious never would have caught higher-ups, because higher-ups simply aren’t involved in such pedestrian matters as small-batch gun acquisition. Even if the ATF/DEA/FBI had tracked the guns, and had worked with Mexican authorities, the operation never would have been able to bring down cartel leaders. No cartel gun investigation of this type ever has, and none ever will. The official line provided by Attorney General Holder is a bald-faced and rather obvious lie.

We know, beyond all reasonable doubt, that Operation Fast and Furious was not in any way related to the DOJ’s official explanation for its existence. The way DOJ carried out the operation and its metrics for “success” also verify that the operation was never designed to lead to a case against cartel leaders.

In any criminal investigation, law enforcement officers have to build a case by tying evidence to actors. In Operation Fast and Furious, the “evidence” would have been the firearms smuggled across the border with ATF’s protection to the cartels. In order to tie the guns to the cartel leaders, the guns would have to be tracked to the possession of the cartel’s leaders, or would have to be tracked to the leaders ordering weapons. This would require extensive surveillance of the weapons inside of Mexico, where the cartels and their leaders operate.

But Operation Fast and Furious was never designed to follow the weapons over the border, in even the most cursory manner. Once the gun shipments went over the Mexican border, the operation was designed, from the ground up, to wait for these guns to turn up at crime scenes. This is not a subject for debate, but an explanation as provided in sworn congressional testimony from multiple ATF agents, and in written communications.

The publicly stated rationale does not come close in any way to the operation that was actually run.

What was Operation Fast and Furious set up to accomplish? You need to look no further than the operational plan itself to discover what the true goal of the plot was.

Fast and Furious was dependent on ATF officials bullying Arizona gun dealers into going along with the straw purchases of thousands of firearms. If they did not comply, they knew they faced the possibility of having their federal firearms licenses yanked and their livelihoods destroyed. At the point of purchase, the firearms obtained by straw purchasers were documented on a ATF Form 4473, a form used for logging purposes and for background checks. Section D of the document records the manufacturer or importer, model number, serial number, type, and caliber or gauge  of each weapon purchased. The ATF then harvested this data, and logged it in a watch list.

From there, all they did was wait.

There was no attempt to track the weapons in Mexico. The operation was conducted without the knowledge of the Mexican government, even as thousands of weapons flowed over the border. Even ATF agents in Mexico testified that they were kept in the dark about the operation.

They waited, without any attempt to interdict the weapons or trace them to anyone from the already known circle of straw buyers that existed before the operation was approved.

They waited until someone died.

As mentioned earlier, firearms are a disposable consumable in the cartel trade. They are used by the gross, and discarded after use. When a weapon is used, the rifling that provides the stabilizing spin to a bullet leaves a unique and traceable “fingerprint” on each bullet it fires. By collecting bullets at a crime scene, law enforcement scientists use ballistic fingerprinting to match a recovered gun to a specific crime. Cartel gunmen ditched weapons at the crime scenes so that they could avoid being caught with them later and be tied to any particular crime. It’s common sense.

Operation Fast and Furious wasn’t designed to catch criminals. Instead, what it was designed to do is log guns our government helped walk in the Fast and Furious watch list, so they could match the list of guns submitted for tracing by the Mexican authorities.

It is definitive that the program was not about catching criminals. That is why the plot never led to the indictment of anyone that wasn’t already a known smuggler at the start of the operation. Fast and Furious was designed for one purpose only, and that was to send trunkloads of known weapons into Mexico and wait for them to be recovered at crime scenes so that they could be traced. Such an operation could never hope to catch cartel kingpins. What it could do — and arguably the only thing it could ever do — is provide a list of weapons used in crimes that could be traced back definitively to a small number of gun dealers operating in a specific area.

Why would the the Obama administration invest in a high-risk, low-reward program that was dependent on guns being used to murder more than 300 Mexican citizens so far?

The 90-percent lie repeated by every major cabinet official tied to a department involved in the plot and the president himself is the obvious link. President Obama, who promised Sarah Brady that he was working on gun control “under the radar,” used the 90-percent lie as an attempt to justify gun control. Attorney General Eric Holder, who became news again over the weekend for a 1995 campaign to demonize guns and gun-owners and who tried to use the terror attacks of  9/11 to justify gun control, pushed to reinstate the so-called “assault weapons” ban.

What excuse did Holder use to argue for reinstating the law? Guess.

“As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons,” Holder told reporters.

Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.

“I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum,” Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also made similar pleas, predicated on gun violence committed with U.S. guns in Mexico.

We know for a fact that Operation Fast and Furious was designed by the Obama administration to put American weapons in the hands of Mexican cartels to kill Mexican citizens, and that the guns recovered in those deaths would be used to call for more gun control.

Hundreds died in a plot that appears to have been designed to impose gun control. It’s past time for the appointment of an independent prosecutor, and to press for criminal charges against those responsible for the carnage that has resulted from the deadliest scandal in U.S. government history.

Bob Owens blogs at Bob-Owens.com.

Gun-tracking operation caught top suspect, then let him go

By Richard A. Serrano, Washington BureauSeven months after federal agents began the ill-fated Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation, they stumbled upon their main suspect in a…

So why did Obama send guns to Mexico and did it work:  to get Nieto elected and it worked.  I believe Obama and Holder meant for project gunrunner to help get their  Man in Mexico elected.

Felipe Calderon was a conservative and anti Obama.

 

Conservatives make gains in Latin America

JUSTICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT SENT GUNS TO MEXICO TO BRING REVOLUTIONARY PARTY TO POWER ?

May 29, 2012

By CMAC

AND, IT WORKED.

DID BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON SEND THOUSANDS OF WEAPONS TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS TO HELP DEFEAT FELIPE CALDERON’S CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND HELP  THEIR MAN: Enrique Pena Nieto AND HIS REVOLUTIONARY PARTY, in Mexico’s 2012 presidential race?

THE THOUSANDS OF GUNS THE JUSTICE  AND STATE DEPARTMENT SENT AND SOLD TO MEXICAN DRUG LORDS  HAVE GIFTED THE PRESIDENCY TO NIETO.
NIETO’S PRIMARY CAMPAIGN PROMISE HAS BEEN TO STOP THE DRUG VIOLENCE BY NOT FIGHTING THE DRUG CARTELS.  HIS BRILLIANT PLAN IS TO CAPITULATE. FOR THIS PROTEGE OF CARLOS SALINAS, THE PLAN IS EXACTLY WHAT SHOULD BE EXPECTED FROM THIS CROOKED POLITICIAN WHO HAS A PROVEN RECORD OF GRAFT AND CORRUPTION AS THE FORMER GOVERNOR OF MEXICO STATE.
THE MEXICAN PEOPLE ARE WEARY OF THE DRUG WAR AND VIOLENCE AND WANT THE VIOLENCE TO STOP.  AT THIS POINT, THEY WILL EVEN LISTEN TO THE HALF BAKED SOLUTIONS OF THIS PROVEN SCOUNDREL NIETO.

Why does Hillary Clinton support Enrique Pena Nieto for the next Mexican president?

Nieto was the protege of Carlos Salinas, one of the most crooked politicians Mexico has ever produce.  Bill Clinton circumvented congress and gave Salinas 40 billion dollars in 94′, 40 billion dollars the Mexican people never received.  Why are the Clinton’s always flush with cash?  Could Salinas have split the money with the Clintons?  THE MEXICAN PEOPLE NEVER GOT A DIME BILL CLINTON GIFTED TO SALINAS.

Nieto has ties to  drug lords and those who launder drug money in Mexico state.  He is repressive and a liar.  He wants to reverse the current war on drugs in Mexico and not prosecute Mexican  drug dealers.

Nieto is interested in expanding the operations of  PEMEX, the state owned oil company and would like to join forces with the state owned Brazilian oil company Petrobas.

Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Obama have their fingers in every facet of the expanding role of the two state owned oil companies.

THE THOUSANDS OF GUNS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT SENT AND SOLD TO MEXICO HAVE GIVEN THE ELECTION TO NIETO.  NIETO’S PRIMARY CAMPAIGN PROMISE HAS BEEN TO STOP THE DRUG VIOLENCE.

 

Mexican vote may determine future of drug war – Washington Times

Enrique Pena Nieto is the candidate of the Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico’s … and officials have said hundreds of drone missions are being flown in support

www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/3/resurgent-party… – Cached

1   Enrique Pena Nieto, Mexico Presidential Front-Runner, Promises To Cut Violence

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will travel to Mexico this month to show support for … PRI candidate Enrique Peña Nieto: Unity can help end …

www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_11911512 – Cached

 

Thursday, March 22, 2012

State Department official explains Hillary Clintonwhy Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stopped using term insurgency when talking about Mexican organized crime

Deputy assistant secretary Matthew Rooney, in appearance at Institute of the Americas in San Diego, also said U.S. security measures imposed in reaction to 9/11 inadvertently undid some U.S.-Mexico-Canada integration, but said Obama administration is working to remedy that
An uncomfortable photo for Pena Nieto. A photo is making the rounds on Twitter, and it is probably one that Enrique Pena Nieto wishes didn’t exist.

blogs.mcclatchydc.com/mexico – Cached

2   Obama ♥s Peña Nieto?

 

US and Mexico sign Transboundary Hydrocarbons Agreement

  1. Enrique Peña Nieto has been the de facto 2012 presidential … Ex-U.S. State Dept. official urges removal of Cuba… … old. Many thanks to readers for your support!

    mexicogulfreporter.blogspot.com/…enrique-pena-nieto.html – Cached

  2. … flopping candidate: Enrique Pena Nieto … and the United States — to hear Peña Nieto declare in a recent news conference his support for … drug raid: The State Department

    neglectedwar.com/blog/archives/16070 – Cached

  1. … runner Enrique Pena Nieto … in office. More than anything, Mexicans want the bloodshed to end, said Pena Nieto, the former governor of the State of … Support
    uk.reuters.com/…/04/10/…penanieto-idUKBRE8380UU20120410 – Cached
  2. Attorney General’s Office, Internal Revenue … Villarreal was treasurer in Coahuila state when it was governed by Humberto Moreira, an ally of Enrique Pena Nieto,

    articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-04-30/business/sns-rt… – Cached

  1. [May 24, 2012] A student-led movement in Mexico accuses broadcasters Televisa and TV Azteca of backing front-running presidential candidate, Enrique Pena Nieto. MEXICO CITY — Some …
    www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/enrique-pena-nieto…
  1. … presidential front-runner Enrique Pena Nieto was … as a father who has failed to support his son. Pena Nieto … on Latin America issues at the State Department

    www.businessweek.com/news/2012-05-11/pena-nieto-painted… – Cached
    More results from businessweek.com »

  2. State of Mexico Governor Enrique Pena Nieto poses with his wife … – 2SPACE.NET – News : World News … for the support. Become a supporting member

    www.2space.net/news/article/320772-1290892802/state-of… – Cached

  1. … runner EnriquePenaNieto … in office. More than anything, Mexicans want the bloodshed to end, said PenaNieto, the former governor of the State of … Support
    uk.reuters.com/…/04/10/…penanieto-idUKBRE8380UU20120410 – Cached
  2. Attorney General’s Office, Internal Revenue … Villarreal was treasurer in Coahuila state when it was governed by Humberto Moreira, an ally of EnriquePenaNieto,

    articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-04-30/business/sns-rt… – Cached

Press Barred from US Politician’s Speech for Mexico State Governor Enrique Peña Nieto

HISTORY  OF MEXICAN POLITICS AND DRUG RELATIONSHIP TO US.

 

Mexico’s Presidential Election: Drugwar Security Plan of Each Candidate

| Borderland Beat Reporter Chivis
From Chivis :
The following will give a loose overview of each candidate’s stance on tackling the drugwar and its violence.  I do not agree with the last paragraph as polls have reflected a majority support of Calderon’s attempt to secure violent regions, such as the use of the  military.
The front runner and PRI candidate Enrique Peña Nieto has vacillated in his stance of withdrawal of forces.  He has stated very little regarding his plan of action but has stated he considers the presence of forces culpable in the escalation of violence.
PAN party’s nomination of the respected and popular Josefina Vazquez Mota, if successful in her bid to the presidency would be the nations first woman president.
In election terms, there is ample amount of time to make it a horse race, and though Peña maintains a wide margin lead, that lead has tightened with a drop of over 10 points in the polls.  Following the Insight article I have posted information on each of the candidates.
Mexico Presidential Candidates Play it Safe with Security Plans
Written by Tim Wilson for INSIGHT
Now that Mexico’s ruling right-of-centre National Action Party (PAN) has chosen Josefina Vazquez Mota as its candidate for the July 1 federal election, the Mexican people can stand back and assess how her public security strategy compares to those of the other two candidates: Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the left-leaning Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD); and Enrique Peña Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI).
Of particular interest is how any strategy will tie in with US policy, and to what extent new approaches will be informed by the aggressive tactics assumed by PAN president Felipe Calderon. We are only now entering into the heat of a six-month campaign; much can happen, and though Peña Nieto is the clear favourite at present, he has stumbled of late, and Ms. Vazquez Mota will likely get a boost from her recent win. Lopez Obrador, running third in the polls, could also see a surge if he can transfer his rural base into urban support.
Below is an assessment of the three candidates’ security platforms, and what the implications might be for the Mexican people and for Mexico-US relations.
Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (PRD)
Lopez Obrador has been a firm critic of the tough, militarized approach pursued by Calderon. He has promised an even application of the law, proposing improved care for victims and an emphasis on the protection of human rights. Practical suggestions include a single police command that will gradually assume security operations in areas that are now under the control of the Army and Navy, as well as a single intelligence agency tasked, in part, with tracking criminal financial networks.
The PRD leader has said that the training of this new police force will emphasize civic and moral values. Lopez Obrador has also said that he is committed to salary and benefits increases for police officers throughout the country – hardly a new suggestion in Mexican politics. All in all, he has come up with ten proposed actions, but one main theme: organized crime cannot be combated as long as, due to its absence or its own actions, the government itself is culpable in the erosion of human rights.
Lopez Obrador has also thrown down a gauntlet to the United States by claiming that as president he would firmly reject any intelligence activities by US agencies, including the introduction of arms or money. This would halt the activities of CIA operatives and agents with the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA); it would also, of course, ban the use of unmanned drones.
It would also call into question the continuance of US aid. (Since 2008 the US government has contributed $1.6 billion in law enforcement aid to the Calderón administration under the Merida Initiative). Given the US government’s botched “Fast and Furious” sting operation – in which guns were deliberately sold to drug operatives in Texas, only to see federal agents lose track of them – this may have popular appeal.
Enrique Peña Nieto (PRI)
Peña Nieto is popular and charismatic, and is seen as having been a competent governor of the state of Mexico (2005-2011). His stated aim is to strengthen the security apparatus – even if it means a complete reinvention of the present structure. Key to this would be ensuring that the Ministry of Public Security, for example, would have complete autonomy and be free of political interference.
Peña Nieto has stated that he would support a withdrawal of military forces from areas that have been hit hard by the war on drugs; however, the terms and conditions have not been spelled out in any detail. He has spoken of the need to maintain “order,” but has suggested that the hard-line approach taken by Caldern has actually destabilized the nation.
This has led his opponents to suggest that he will let the state retreat, and allow for de facto control of certain plazas by the cartels. That said, in response to accusations made by president Calderon that the PRI might negotiate with the cartels in order to keep the peace, Peña Nieto and other PRI party officials have clearly stated that they will not engage in any dialogue with criminal organizations.
Mr. Calderon, however, is not alone in his concern. American officials are believed to have stated in private that the PRI, which ruled Mexico for 71 years until losing to the PAN’s Vicente Fox in 2000, could revert to its old tactic of allowing some cartels to operate with a degree of autonomy, so long as they keep the peace. It is unlikely, perhaps even impossible, that any candidate could blatantly support this approach during the presidential campaign, but it may have some electoral appeal to a citizenry weary of the conflict.
Josefina Vazquez Mota (PAN)
Vazquez Mota has promised to continue with Calderon’s highly aggressive, militarized efforts to break the cartels. During the last six years of the Calderon administration the level of engagement with Mexican and US law enforcement has reached unprecedented levels. Under Ms. Vazquez Mota this would continue, with more US aid likely to flow beyond law enforcement and into efforts at strengthening Mexico’s justice system.
Programs that support CIA and drone activity would stay in place, and possibly even expand, though Ms. Vazquez Mota has equivocated with regard to the role of the military in civilian areas. Her “firm hand” includes a proposal for life imprisonment for any politician found to have been corrupted by organized crime.
What It Means
The unpopularity of the war on organized crime, which was initiated by Calderon and has resulted in over 47,000 deaths, will be a major liability for Vázquez Mota, who has promised “no truce” with the cartels. So far, the political benefit has fallen to Peña Nieto, who represents a fresh face and, he would argue, a reformed PRI. Lopez Obrador, who narrowly lost the last election against Calderon, is seen by some as a man who is too sure of himself – he staged six weeks of demonstrations after his presidential defeat which, in the end, reduced his popularity. But he has impressive name recognition, and support from a poor and rural base that, thanks to electoral reforms, now actually gets most of its votes counted.
Whatever the outcome, the United States will work with any of the three leaders. The irony is that Vazquez Mota may lose this election to Peña Nieto as a result of the unpopularity of her predecessor’s security policies, yet it is highly likely that the PRI will continue the same overall course of action. If the PRD were to win, however, we could expect a chilly reception from Washington, and real anxiety that the bilateral efforts that have been made to date would be for naught. This is not to say that Lopez Obrador would capitulate to the drug cartels, but by reducing cooperation with the US, and pulling security forces out of some areas, the result could be an effective ceding of certain plazas to organized crime.
Addendum posted by Chivis:
PAN
A center-right party, the PAN was founded in 1939 and was long considered the “loyal opposition” to Mexico’s long-ruling PRI. Though it was tolerated along with other opposition parties throughout the PRI’s 71 years in power, the PAN was never permitted to win a significant election until its first gubernatorial win in 1989. The PAN became the first party to defeat the PRI and break its strangle-hold on  the presidency  in 2000 with Vicente Fox as their candidate.  Fox, a relative party outsider with a successful career as CEO of Coca-Cola,  The PAN won again in a tight election in 2006 with the current President Felipe Calderón.
Presently, the PAN holds eight state governorships and 28.2 percent of the seats in the Chamber of Deputies (147 out of 500) and 39.1 percent of the Senate (50 of the 128 seats).
PRI
Formed after the devastating Mexican Revolution (1910-1920) and the period of political instability that followed, the PRI was formed in an effort to prevent further violence among rival political groups.  The stability that ensued was so successful that the party dominated at all levels of government until 2000. The PRI held all state governorships until 1989, a majority in both congressional chambers until 1997, and the presidency until 2000.
Organized around broad “sectors” of society, the PRI stayed in power and kept its incorporated groups in the coalition through a combination of party discipline and government largess, and supplemented with a combination of electoral manipulation, intimidation and outright fraud, as well as ideological swings intended to reflect broader political dynamics in the country. Historically, the party has been considered nationalist, with members from the socialist left to a business elite making up its ranks.
After two tough presidential elections (2000 and 2006), in which the PRI lost its grip on the presidency, the party has undergone a process of soul-searching and reforms in an attempt to break with its past and project an image of competent democratic leadership.  The party swept the 2009 congressional elections and now represent the largest faction in the Chamber of Deputies with 48.0 percent (240 seats) and the second largest in the Senate with 27.8 percent (33 seats). They also now have 19 state governorships, and the prospects for the 2012 presidential race seem much more promising than they did in the 2006 election
PRD
In 1986, a group of prominent left-leaning pro-reform priístas formed the Corriente Democrático (Democratic Current) within the PRI party in an effort to promote a more democratic and open party that they felt had become calcified and hierarchical. After their reforms failed to take root in the party, a number of them, including the son of former Mexican President and founder of the PRI – Lázaro Cárdenas, publically split with the PRI. President Cárdenas’s son, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, quickly became the leader of a fractured and disaffected left, and ran for President with the support of numerous parties in 1988.
Cárdenas is widely believed to have won the election, but it was marred by extensive allegations of fraud and the PRI’s candidate, Carlos Salinas de Gotari, was declared the winner.  After this experience, the parties of the left and disaffected priístas joined together to form the PRD and began the process of fielding unified candidates under the PRD banner.
The party is strongest in Central and Southern Mexico, where it holds five governorships, the mayorship of Mexico City, which it has held since Cuautémoc Cárdenas became the first directly elected mayor of the capital city in 1997, and the majority of the Mexico City Assembly. At present, there are 25 PRD senators, representing 19.5 percent of all seats, and 72 deputies, equaling 13.6 percent of the Chamber.
In federal elections until 2006, the PRD generally trailed the other two major parties. However, in that last election, candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador lost the election by just .58 percent of the popular vote. López Obrador and his supporters denounced the election as fraudulent, though the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) rejected this claim based on a partial recount and other evidence. When the IFE denied the request for a full recount, the PRD called for demonstrations in the capital and named López Obrador the “legitimate president of Mexico.”
These tactics did not appeal to all party members, leading to several years of bitter infighting. Recently, however, the major PRD figures put aside their divisions and appeared together in a united front to support their candidate for governor in the State of Mexico elections (July 3rd).
All photos and logos were added to the INSIGHT article

Seized guns were bound for Zetas

| Borderland Beat Reporter Ovemex

These AK-47 and AR-15 rifles were seized in a recent operation that netted more than 200 firearms. Photo: Robin Jerstad, For The Express-News / SA       My San Antonio News Authorities said Wednesday that in breaking up a San Antonio-based smuggling ring that funneled guns to the Zetas drug cartel across the border from Eagle Pass and Del Rio, they seized 203 weapons but were unable to stop every shipment. Officers said they confiscated mostly assault-style rifles and one .50-caliber Barrett sniper rifle in five separate shipments between May and August 2010. But they said they also learned that three other shipments with an unknown number of weapons made it to Mexico before they started investigating. They arrested 22 defendants — all from the San Antonio area — accused in the smuggling, nine of whom have been sentenced to prison terms ranging from one year to 14. The defendants include eight housewives, authorities said. One defendant recruited his mother as a “straw buyer” and his aunt to be a transporter, said Crisanto Perez, assistant special agent in charge of the ATF in San Antonio. Authorities said the smuggling organization was led by Marino Castro Jr., 27, and Edward Levar Davis, 33. Davis was sentenced to 14 years in prison for his role. Castro is awaiting sentencing in Del Rio. The announcement came a day after Keith Edwards, 23, was sentenced in Del Rio to 87 months and Ricky Gonzales, 22, got 42 months. It was made by U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman and his prosecutors, joined by agents with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firerams and Explosives, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations and the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office. “What we’re talking about today really is just a part of the larger cycle of corruption of society by the illegal drug market,” Pitman said. “These prosecutions are meant to hold those responsible for putting … firearms in the hands of violent drug traffickers accountable for the part that they play.” The case began when ATF agents received a tip that one of the defendants was acting as a straw buyer of firearms from licensed gun dealers here for shipment to Mexico. A straw purchaser is a U.S. citizen with a clean background who generally is paid to lie on sales paperwork to buy guns for someone else. Buyers were paid $100 to $200 for each gun, which typically retail for $800 to $1,400, depending on the manufacturer. Jerry Robinette, special agent in charge of ICE-Homeland Security Investigations in San Antonio, described the licensed gun dealers as “our eyes and ears” who cooperate with law enforcement in such cases. The tip grew into four separate investigations, and agents connected their leads to the same cell. They said the case wasn’t connected to this week’s arrest of 13 others suspected of providing tactical rifles to the Zetas. The ATF’s Perez warned the public to be aware that the criminal element is recruiting younger people. Half of the defendants in the Castro-Davis case were between the ages of 22 and 25. “One hundred dollars to buy a gun for someone is not worth ruining your life,” Perez said. “You will be investigated, you will be arrested and you will be prosecuted. Share it:

 

Blood Brothers: The alliance between Mexican cartels and U.S. gangs may be the most serious threat to our national security

 

Everyone now knows how crazy Hitler was, but in real time who followed Hitler and his insane actions?

1.     Where did Hitler implement  his  philosophy?

In the most educated country in the world in 1920.

2.      Who supported Hitler and his philosophies?

The most educated individuals of the time:

a.    Gerhart Hauptmann Nobel Prize for Literature 1912:

b.       Philipp Lenard Nobel Prize for Physics 1905

c.     Johannes Stark Winner of the 1919 Nobel Prize in Physics

d.       DR.Oswald Spengler– AUTHOR OF THE DECLINE OF THE WEST

e.       MOELDER VANDENBROOK – WROTE THE THIRD REICH

f.       CARL SHMITT ONE OF THE BEST LEGAL MINDS IN EARLY 20TH CENTURY

g.     PHILOSOPHER –Martin Heidegger: BRIGHTEST PHILOSOPHICAL MIND OF HIS GENERATION

SOME OF THE MOST INTELLIGENT MEN IN GERMANY SUPPORTED NATIONAL SOCIALISM.

NATIONAL SOCIALISM APPEALED TO THE YOUNG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS and the worker’s unions.

HITLER SAID:
“WE ARE socialists. , we are the enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions”

Hitler followed Three major themes:

collectivism, socialism, nationalism.

 

The main NAZI PRICIPLES were:

COLLECTIVISM

INSTINCT, PASSION

WAR/CONFLICT

AUTHORITARIANISM

SOCIALISM

Hitler claimed to want to liberate the working class, but

HITLER  KILLED 20 MILLION PEOPLE

MAZ TSE TUNG KILLED 35 MILLION PEOPLE

STALIN KILLED 60 MILLION PEOPLE

OBAMA HAS KILLED OVER 3,000 CHRISTIANS IN AFRICA.

The well meaning socialist agenda repeatedly devolved into the ruthless killing  of millions of people.

What did the Hitlerian socialist agenda sound like to the masses who were hearing it in real time?

It sounded like Obama’s socialist agenda.

The NATIONALIST SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKER PARTY,  WAS FOUNDED ON 25 POINTS;

COLLECTIVISM AND REJECTION OF INDIVIDUALISM

POINT 10

“IT MUST BE THE FIRST DUTY OF EVERY CITIZEN TO PERFORM MENTAL OR PHYSICAL WORK, INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITY MUST NOT VIOLATE THE GENERAL INTEREST BUT MUST BE EXERCISED WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE COMMUNITY, AND FOR THE GENERAL GOOD”.

REJECT THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS AND INDIVIDUALISM
“THE COMMON INTEREST OVER INDIVIDUAL INTEREST”

SOCIALISM VS CAPITALISM IS EMPHASIZED IN 14 OF THE 25 THEMES OR POINTS.

11.  THE ABOLITION OF ALL INCOME GAINED BY LOANING MONEY AT INTEREST.

13.  THE NATIONALIZATION OF ALL CORPORATIONS.

14.  PROFIT -SHARING IN LARGE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES.

15.  GENEROUS DEVELOPMENT OF STATE-RUN OLD AGE INSURANCE.

16.  THE IMMEDIATE SOCIALIZATION OF THE HUGE DEPARTMENT STORES.

 

Joseph Goebles hated capitalism

He had five degrees before receiving his PHD from Heidelberg University in1921.  He agreed with Marx and Engels  .  He said money had made slave out of all of us.   A worker in a capitalistic state is a kog

 

The ANTI-NAZI PRICIPLES were:

INDIVIDUALISM

REASON

PRODUCTIVENESS/WINs

LIBERALISM/LIBERTY

CAPITALISM

When was the best time to stop Hitler?

Before he became Chancellor,

but anytime Christians draw a line is the best time to stop the spirit of Hitler/Obama.

 

OBAMA

 

 

Meeting Young Marxist Obama 02.24.11
Rally of 2,000 Marxists, Communists and Socialists Launched Obama’s Career. Event was Planned by Communist, Bill Ayers and Coordinated by Communist, Carl Davidson 12.08.09
Obama Actively Participated in 1996 Rally Co-sponsored by Democratic Socialists of America 10.23.10
Obama Attended “Socialist Scholars Conference” and Discovered His Vocation as a Community Organizer 10.17.10
LORD MONCKTON DISCUSSES OBAMA’S FORGERIES AND RIGHTLY IDENTIFIES OBAMA AS A COMMUNIST! 

OBAMA’S COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST ACTIVITIES AND RELATIONSHIPS
In-Depth Looks at Barack Hussein Obama’s Ties to: The Communist Party, The Democratic Socialists of America, The (Communist) New Party and Progress Chicago Political Party, The Communist Committees of Correspondence, The Chicago Socialist Movement, (Communist Organization) ACORN and Project Vote, (Communist Organization) SEIU, and Annenberg Challenge and Woods Fund 04.09.10
Obama Attended Several Annual Sessions of the “Socialist Scholars Conference” 10.30.10
CONFIRMED: OBAMA IS A MARXIST. Obama’s College Acquaintence Spills the Beans. 02.07.10
BARACK, THE MARXIST STUDENT: Dr. John Drew, Who Knew Obama at Occidental, is Interviewed. Says Obama was an Ardent Marxist/Leninist, Who Wanted the Working Class to Overthrow the Gov’t and to Implement a Socialist Utopia – Interview (Skip to Halfway Point)

 



  • Share/Bookmark

Leave a Reply

Ads Plugin created by Jake Ruston - Sponsored by Broyhill Furniture.